<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Monta&#8217;s Bad +/-</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1984watch.com/2010/01/04/re-montas-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1984watch.com/2010/01/04/re-montas-bad/</link>
	<description>Inside the madness of the Warriors is some great metaphor for life...that Don Nelson ate.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:17:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://1984watch.com/2010/01/04/re-montas-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-235985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1984watch.com/?p=277#comment-235985</guid>
		<description>I used to think that passing PGs were overrated, and that a team could function just fine without one (the pre Kidd Mavs for example).  Not sure how I feel about that premise right now, but I do think there has to be a better system than Nellie&#039;s (understatement).  I don&#039;t think Randolph can be the creator Nellie wants, but I&#039;m intrigued by his ability to dribble past his man.  Not saying that AR is our PG of the future, just that a few plays of Randolph driving and kicking to Ellis wouldn&#039;t hurt the cause.  I&#039;d also add that the Warriors might be wise to trade Ellis...if I trusted management to get equal value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think that passing PGs were overrated, and that a team could function just fine without one (the pre Kidd Mavs for example).  Not sure how I feel about that premise right now, but I do think there has to be a better system than Nellie&#8217;s (understatement).  I don&#8217;t think Randolph can be the creator Nellie wants, but I&#8217;m intrigued by his ability to dribble past his man.  Not saying that AR is our PG of the future, just that a few plays of Randolph driving and kicking to Ellis wouldn&#8217;t hurt the cause.  I&#8217;d also add that the Warriors might be wise to trade Ellis&#8230;if I trusted management to get equal value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://1984watch.com/2010/01/04/re-montas-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-235984</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1984watch.com/?p=277#comment-235984</guid>
		<description>Yep -- a worthwhile experiment, but the results of that experiment have come in, and they ain&#039;t pretty.

It wouldn&#039;t be as big of a deal if Nellie weren&#039;t so enamored with the idea of an offensive auteur that could create all over the floor.  In looking over Nellie&#039;s history, it&#039;s been a damn long time since he coached without a pretty brilliant playmaker, whether it be Timmy, Nash or Baron.  Since Baron left, he&#039;s tried to cast Jack, Monta and Curry as a brilliant playmaker, and even seems to think Randolph has potential in that department.  It&#039;s getting sort of absurd.

There are teams that function just fine without an offensive maestro -- we have a lot of guys that can do some things.  Some consistent plays and rotations would work for us.  But sadly, I&#039;m guessing we&#039;ll just have to watch Monta do his bad Baron impression for at least the rest of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep &#8212; a worthwhile experiment, but the results of that experiment have come in, and they ain&#8217;t pretty.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be as big of a deal if Nellie weren&#8217;t so enamored with the idea of an offensive auteur that could create all over the floor.  In looking over Nellie&#8217;s history, it&#8217;s been a damn long time since he coached without a pretty brilliant playmaker, whether it be Timmy, Nash or Baron.  Since Baron left, he&#8217;s tried to cast Jack, Monta and Curry as a brilliant playmaker, and even seems to think Randolph has potential in that department.  It&#8217;s getting sort of absurd.</p>
<p>There are teams that function just fine without an offensive maestro &#8212; we have a lot of guys that can do some things.  Some consistent plays and rotations would work for us.  But sadly, I&#8217;m guessing we&#8217;ll just have to watch Monta do his bad Baron impression for at least the rest of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://1984watch.com/2010/01/04/re-montas-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-235983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1984watch.com/?p=277#comment-235983</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing. Not sure why he fancies himself a playmaker, I was in the camp of people who thought he should get a chance to be one.  Well, he got it, and he tends to miss open cutters and lose the ball out of bounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing. Not sure why he fancies himself a playmaker, I was in the camp of people who thought he should get a chance to be one.  Well, he got it, and he tends to miss open cutters and lose the ball out of bounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://1984watch.com/2010/01/04/re-montas-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-235982</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1984watch.com/?p=277#comment-235982</guid>
		<description>Agreed on all counts... Monta makes a great bullet, but a kinda crappy gun.

Like you, I don&#039;t know what the solution is.  I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s not Stephen Curry, but at least putting the ball in Curry&#039;s hands to start every play would free Monta up to do his scoring thing.  I think a big problem here is that Monta fancies himself a playmaker, and that Nellie humoring him in this delusion.  He will not be a real asset again until everybody in the organization, including Monta, agrees that he&#039;s a shooting guard.

Not that I&#039;d trust the current regime to do it properly, but you have to at least consider trading the guy.  If we can&#039;t ever seem to find the piece that fits next to Monta, maybe Monta is the piece we should get rid of.  His counting stats are big and his SportsCenter appearances are common, so you might be able to trade him for some value right now.  That won&#039;t happen, and maybe it shouldn&#039;t... but this is a dicey, enigmatic type of player to hitch your franchise to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed on all counts&#8230; Monta makes a great bullet, but a kinda crappy gun.</p>
<p>Like you, I don&#8217;t know what the solution is.  I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s not Stephen Curry, but at least putting the ball in Curry&#8217;s hands to start every play would free Monta up to do his scoring thing.  I think a big problem here is that Monta fancies himself a playmaker, and that Nellie humoring him in this delusion.  He will not be a real asset again until everybody in the organization, including Monta, agrees that he&#8217;s a shooting guard.</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;d trust the current regime to do it properly, but you have to at least consider trading the guy.  If we can&#8217;t ever seem to find the piece that fits next to Monta, maybe Monta is the piece we should get rid of.  His counting stats are big and his SportsCenter appearances are common, so you might be able to trade him for some value right now.  That won&#8217;t happen, and maybe it shouldn&#8217;t&#8230; but this is a dicey, enigmatic type of player to hitch your franchise to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
